Powered by
UI
Techs
Home
>
Forums
>
>
General Discussion
>
Muslim Community Response (NEWS)
Post Reply
Username
Invalid Username or Password
Password
Format
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
1
2
3
4
5
6
Message Icon
Message
- Forum Code is ON
- HTML is OFF
Smilies
[quote]FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Press Release: Unprecedented Muslim Community Response to Proposed Anti-Terrorism Measures London, UK, August 16 - Leading Muslim groups and personalities in the UK have come together in an unprecedented way, formulating and issuing a six point statement in response to some of the recently proposed anti-terrorism measures in the aftermath of the London bombings. Signatories of the statement include Islamic Party of Britain, Islamic Human Rights Commission, Muslim Association of Britain, FOSIS, Q News magazine, An-Nisa Society, Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain, Yvonne Ridley and Islam Channel, Shaikh Haitham Haddad, and Islamic Forum Europe amongst others. More organisations and personalities within the community continued sending in their support even after the deadline for release, and the signatories remain open to many others endorsing the message. The statement reiterates the Muslim community's unequivocal denunciation of acts of terrorism and stresses that the Muslim community "has always been a law-abiding community and all its endeavours to create a just society have been entirely peaceful". In brief, the six points of the statement are: 1. The term extremism has no tangible legal meaning or definition and is therefore unhelpful and emotive. 2. The right of people anywhere in the world to resist invasion and occupation is legitimate. 3. Questioning the legitimacy of the Israeli state is legitimate political _expression. 4. The proposal to ban the non-violent organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir is unwarranted, unjust and unwise. 5. Arbitrary closure of mosques may prevent legitimate political discourse in mosques fuelling a radical sub-culture. 6. Deporting foreign nationals to countries known for gross human rights abuses is abhorrent. The signatories of the statement conclude by saying, "This list of concerns is not conclusive, but we are putting these issues forward to help prevent a knee-jerk reaction to recent events which would drive a rift between communities in the UK and set the course of British politics onto the slippery slope of intellectual censorship and totalitarianism." THE FULL TEXT OF THE STATEMENT AND SIGNATORIES FOLLOWS BELOW. [ ENDS ] In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate A MUSLIM COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO SOME OF THE PROPOSED ANTI- TERRORISM MEASURES As members of the Muslim community the undersigned individuals and organisations feel the need to communicate our view regarding some of the recently proposed antiterrorism measures in the aftermath of the London bombings, and address statements made by the Prime Minister in the past few weeks. The British Muslim community has always been a law-abiding community and all its endeavours to create a more just society have been entirely peaceful. We fear that recent events are being exploited by some sections in society to demonise legitimate Islamic values and beliefs and hence consider it appropriate to make the following observations: 1. The term “extremism”, frequently used in the public discourse about religion and terrorism, has no tangible legal meaning or definition and is thus unhelpful and emotive. To equate ‘extremism’ with the aspirations of Muslims for Shariah laws in the Muslim world or the desire to see unification towards a Caliphate in the Muslim lands, as seemed to be misrepresented by the Prime Minister, is inaccurate and disingenuous. It indicates ignorance of what the Shariah is and what a Caliphate is and will alienate and victimise the Muslim community unnecessarily. 2. The Muslim community in Britain has unequivocally denounced acts of terrorism. However, the right of people anywhere in the world to resist invasion and occupation is legitimate. Therefore the proposal to criminalise ‘justification’ or ‘validation’ of such self defence appears to be intended to stifle discussion about, and support for, such resistance. Thus anyone even verbally opposing the illegal invasion of Iraq, for example, could in future be made out to be justifying and supporting ‘acts of terrorism’ and prosecuted. We are concerned that these proposed measures are intended to prevent the popular opposition witnessed in the run- up to the Iraq war should the United States wish to attack Iran, Syria or any other sovereign nation in the near future. 3. It is natural for Muslims to feel sympathy with fellow Muslims elsewhere in the world and to desire justice for those of them living under oppression. Many people compare the Israeli reality with South African apartheid and demand a similar solution. To denounce anybody who questions the legitimacy of Israel will be seen as an attempt to silence academic thought and legitimate political _expression. If the government hopes to pander to Zionist pressure by condemning and excluding from this country people who are critical of Israeli apartheid, it is in fact supporting apartheid. 4. The proposal to ban the non-violent organisation Hizb ut- Tahrir is, in our view, unwarranted, unjust and unwise, and runs counter to all the principles which Western democracies are currently trying to promote abroad. Any disagreement with a political organisation must be expressed through debate not censorship. Whatever objections one may have to someone else’s point of view, we must uphold their right to hold and articulate those views. If it is suggested that any laws have been broken by any individuals or groups then this must be proven by due legal process. Criminalising the mere possession of certain opinions is the hallmark of dictatorships, not democracies. 5. The same reasoning applies to the proposal to close mosques if they are arbitrarily defined as being ‘extremist’ or to try and politically influence what may or may not be said during a religious talk. This would amount to a collective punishment of the community and will be likely to create fear and prevent legitimate political discussion within mosques. This repression could lead to the very radical subculture which we all seek to prevent. 6. The proposal to deport and/or extradite foreign nationals to countries known for gross human rights abuses is abhorrent to a civilized nation, irrelevant of whether or not a diplomatic assurance that deportees will not be mistreated is obtained. This recent move comes across as a cynical attempt to resolve the problem of dealing with those currently under “control orders” after the judiciary found their continued detention without trial to be unlawful. Given that the alleged bombers on 7 July in London were British nationals, such an exploitation of the events to move against foreign nationals as well as unwanted asylum seekers is indeed shameful. This list of concerns is not conclusive, but we are putting these issues forward to help prevent a knee-jerk reaction to recent events which would drive a rift between communities in the UK and set the course of British politics onto the slippery slope of intellectual censorship and totalitarianism. Signed: 1. 1990 Trust 2. Al-Ikhlas Foundation 3. An-Nisa Society 4. Algerian Community in Britain – Supporters of FIS 5. Association of Muslim Lawyers 6. Bangla 2000 7. Cageprisoners 8. Centre of Muslim Affairs 9. Comparative Religious Centre Ltd 10. Crescent International 11. Dr Usama Hasan 12. Forum Against Islamophobia & Racism (FAIR) 13. Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS) 14. Friends of al-Aqsa 15. Hasan al-Thaqafi - Islam Channel 16. Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain 17. Imam Shakeel Begg - Kent & Lewisham Islamic Centre 18. Innovative Minds 19. International Muslims Organisation 20. Islam Channel 21. Islamic Forum Europe 22. Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) 23. Islamic Observatory Centre 24. Islamic Party of Britain 25. Mindsprings 26. Muslim Association of Britain (MAB) 27. Muslim Directory 28. New Civilization Foundation 29. Party for Islamic Renewal 30. Prisoners of the West 31. Q-News 32. Racial Attacks & Harassment Monitoring Association (RAHMA) 33. Salam Magazine 34. Sheykh Haitham al-Haddad - Shariah Council UK 35. Sheykh Suliman Gani 36. Stop Political Terror 37. World Islamic Propagation Establishment UK 38. Yvonne Ridley – Political Editor, Islam Channel 15 August 2005 Islamic Party of Britain info@islamicparty.com http://www.islamicparty.com[/quote]
Mode
Prompt
Help
Basic
Check here to be notified by email whenever someone replies to your topic
Show Preview
Share
|
Copyright
Studying-Islam
© 2003-7 |
Privacy Policy
|
Code of Conduct
|
An Affiliate of
Al-Mawrid Institute of Islamic Sciences ®
Top