Studying Islam

Post Reply

Username

Invalid Username or Password

Password

Format

Message Icon

Message

- Forum Code is ON
- HTML is OFF

Smilies

[quote]I see there is a mix up in my post also. The following post(15/7) of mine heretofore has been shown as though it is a quote of Samsher Ali's post:-

"Thank you dear Samsher. So it is despite the fact that according to the very tradition which is stated to be the main basis of this ritual Hazrat Umar Farooq once kissed the black stone with abhorrence (abaahat) saying that it was just a stone with no heavenly attributes whatsoever and he kissed it only because he had seen the Prophet (PBUH)kissing it. But there is a Hadees also that this stone is the right hand of God. Is it not Shirk worse than Hindoo's stone worshipping as they take the stones only as symbols without ascribing any heavenly attributes to them (See Bollywood film Naastik). History states that the Yamanies (Muslims, of course) once took away this stone and fixed it in a latrine (Perhaps to show abhorrence to the 'Shirk' of worshipping it).

But the man is by nature a 'Stone worshipper' by whatever label he is called. They kill humans, the progeny of Aadam, mercilessly by calling them 'kafirs' when God says that He lives in the heart of every human but worship stones and say "Is mein harj hi kia he". (Then why didn't they also worship the hundreds of idols placed inside Kaaba instead of breaking them all) 
Oh God, "He darveshi bhi ayyaari, sultani bhi ayyari". Yih Deen Dharam, yih Ishq-o-muhabbat sub Maaya he? "Wa mal Hayyatudunya illa mataaul gharoor" says the Quran e Hakeem and asks us again and again, "Why don't you think?". 
 
tilawat

PAKISTAN   Posted - Saturday, July 15,[/quote]

Mode

Check here to be notified by email whenever someone replies to your topic

Show Preview