Powered by
UI
Techs
Home
>
Forums
>
>
General Discussion
>
Hadith's Authenticity
Post Reply
Username
Invalid Username or Password
Password
Format
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
1
2
3
4
5
6
Message Icon
Message
- Forum Code is ON
- HTML is OFF
Smilies
[quote][quote]sister, Bukhari, Muslim and Abu Daud differ in their collection of ahadith considered as authentic. Shiat believe in ahadith of Hazrat Ali as authentic.no problem. till you say ahadith become a source of religion.[/quote] I don't consider Ahaadeeth to be a source of religion, though there [b]is[/b] guidance in them. Quote: "quote: the Prophet (SAW) at first did not allow his Companions to write down his words. But later on, he did what is the proof of this? Another hadith?!!" No. In fact, I don't have any proof. But this is a part of history. You read the Holy Prophet's (SAW) biography and you get to know that later on he did allow his words to be written down. Quote: The hadith were collected several hundred years after the prophet passed away. had he given permission in his lifetime, then why did people wait so long? Allah knows the answer to this question. But I think this was because of the fact that during the Holy Prophet's (SAW) time, his Companions (RA) had preserved the Ahaadeeth pretty well, so there was no great need of compiling them. A few hundred years later, many people began to corrupt the Ahaadeeth by fabricating them, adding and subtracting from them. So Imaam Bukhari, by the Grace of Allah, took up the task of collecting the uncorrupted Ahaadeeth, and he [b]was[/b], Alhamdulillaah successful. And Allah knows best. Wassalaam.[/quote]
Mode
Prompt
Help
Basic
Check here to be notified by email whenever someone replies to your topic
Show Preview
Share
|
Copyright
Studying-Islam
© 2003-7 |
Privacy Policy
|
Code of Conduct
|
An Affiliate of
Al-Mawrid Institute of Islamic Sciences ®
Top