Powered by
UI
Techs
Home
>
Forums
>
>
General Discussion
>
The Place of Tasawwuf in Traditional Islam
Post Reply
Username
Invalid Username or Password
Password
Format
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
1
2
3
4
5
6
Message Icon
Message
- Forum Code is ON
- HTML is OFF
Smilies
[quote]Brother Usmani, I hope you can see the obvious contradictions among the Ahadith of even sihah sittah. Quran is free from any contradiction as claimed vehemently by Quran itself but since hadith had no protection from Alimghty one can see the results.Just on one topic there are Ahadith giving totally opposite views. It is not only in this matter I can produce countless contradictory Ahadith on so many issues.It is exactly due to this reason that we have various sects in our ummah and each sect brings its own sets of Ahadith whilst defending or promoting their point of view. You write; These seven examples are more than sufficient to prove that the writing of ahâdîth was not only permitted but also ordered by the Holy Prophet (pbuh) and that the earlier bar against writing was only for a transitory period to avoid any possible confusion between the verses of the Holy Qur’ân and the ahâdîth. After this transitory period the fear of confusion ended, the bar was lifted and the companions were persuaded to preserve ahâdîth in a written form. I gave you reference of the hadith from Abu Dawood which proves all the seven Ahadith wrong because this hadith refers to an incident which took place 30 years after the demise of prophet sws.Hazrat Zaid bin Sabit ra was one of those few companions who were present during the qirat of ‘Arza I Akheera’.One of the most reliable of prophet’s companions. If prophet sws had said anything like your referred Ahadith portray then hazrat Zaid would have known about it as he was prophet’s closest companions. Most of the ahadith you have quoted are from weaker sources and not from Sihah sittah anyway.So your argument has hardly any weight.Please read this again; Zayd Ibn Thabit ra(The Prophet's closest revelation writer) visited the Khalifa Mu'aawiyah (more than 30 years after the Prophet's death), and told him a story about the Prophet. Mu'aawiyah liked the story and ordered someone to write it down. But Zayd said. " the messenger of God ordered us NEVER to write anything of his hadith," (Sunan of Abu-Dawood under Hadith No. 1635 (3640): You write; I have already explaind it through the Quran that Prophet(pbuh) words are final in the interpretation of Quran.When comes to this type of decision where the life of some one is involved so what is important to make sure that the hadith which says so is a sahih and that its come to us through tawatur.Further more it is not our job to do that it is the job of those people who are expert in this field (sehelors of ahdith). You have also shown in your answer that if there is a sahih hadith you would not care about the obvious verses of the Quran. Brother,I think this is my last post on the issue as there is nothing else i can add to this topic. However, before i conclude my message i would like you to ponder over this verse from Holy Quran; AND PROPHET SWS WOULD SAY ‘O’ MY LORD MY PEOPLE HAD ABANDONED THIS QURAN.(surah Furqan verse 30). The reason propeht sws would say so,in my view, is the way this ummah has treated Quran.A book which was supposed to be the Meezan and Furqan and Muhaiman unfortunately has not been given its due position. WO ZAMANEY MEIN MUAZZAZ THAY MUSSALMAN HO KAR AUR TUM KHWAR HUAY TARK E QURAN HO KAR[/quote]
Mode
Prompt
Help
Basic
Check here to be notified by email whenever someone replies to your topic
Show Preview
Share
|
Copyright
Studying-Islam
© 2003-7 |
Privacy Policy
|
Code of Conduct
|
An Affiliate of
Al-Mawrid Institute of Islamic Sciences ®
Top