Powered by
UI
Techs
Home
>
Forums
>
>
General Discussion
>
critics
Post Reply
Username
Invalid Username or Password
Password
Format
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
1
2
3
4
5
6
Message Icon
Message
- Forum Code is ON
- HTML is OFF
Smilies
[quote][quote][quote]Its very simple, you read and listen the view points of different types of scholars. Then you will be in a position to make a distinction between them. Its not rocket science! Ghamidi's research is very deep and his arguments are logical & powerful.[/quote][blue]If the arguments of the writer/speaker appear logical & powerful.you will surely be in a position [hl]to make a distinction[/hl] between them. But what is the criterion by which you would [hl]judge the Superiority[/hl]?[/blue] Edited by: aboosait on Sunday, January 11, 2009 1:36 AM[/quote] It is his life long research that makes him superior than others. He conducted his research in a critical manner and analysed his own views for long time before he wrote them down. Ghamidi's deep knowledge of classical arabic, world's history, religion, philosophy and poetry makes him superior than others. His logical and powerful arguments make him superior than others. Mr. Ghamidi lived in seclusion for 20 years to reach the truth before he started propogating it. You can not compare Mr. Ghamidi with these stupid Mullahs who hardly know anything about Islam. These Mullahs are not even worthy to untie the thong of Ghamidi's sandals. I am using words of John the baptist that he used to describe the greatness of Jesus Christ. Dont take it in literate sense.[/quote]
Mode
Prompt
Help
Basic
Check here to be notified by email whenever someone replies to your topic
Show Preview
Share
|
Copyright
Studying-Islam
© 2003-7 |
Privacy Policy
|
Code of Conduct
|
An Affiliate of
Al-Mawrid Institute of Islamic Sciences ®
Top