Powered by
UI
Techs
Home
>
Forums
>
>
General Discussion
>
Arguments regarding the existance of God
Post Reply
Username
Invalid Username or Password
Password
Format
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
1
2
3
4
5
6
Message Icon
Message
- Forum Code is ON
- HTML is OFF
Smilies
[quote]With the name of Allah, Assalaamu’alaikum, every one Thank you Naina and Jazakallah, No doubt God is exhaled from all these imperfections and we must believe without thinking. I have the same thinking as yours. You must know that I have already pointed your words “without thinking” to take guidance from Qura’nic verse (Baqra-3) and this was the only objective of my writing (see above). But I am sorry to say that you had just a bird’s eye view, selecting the text of your own choice with no comment on the remaining of what I have written above. Your way of assessment and inferring is absolutely wrong and discouraging. This is never allowed in Islam (see subsequently). You could not differentiate between “Speaking to Hazrat Musa shows (or seems to be) that….” not Naubbillah “ I am sure that speaking to Hazrat Musa….” The first statement was just an imagination (as at various sites of Quran and Ahadith) in the light of the evidences, not an intention and you know well “The reward of the deeds depends upon the intentions” (Hadith). The above two statements are not at all one and the same but have a lot of difference to mean like between “peace & piece” This is the use of these words, which passes or fails someone in the examination. We think that the paper was easy and we have hit that but unfortunately we are ignorant of the forthcoming “big zero”. Please don’t arrest your mind and correct your perception for the better convenience so that you understand clearly. It is very important to think having a broad spectrum, keeping in mind all the circumstances otherwise the thinking remains paralysed e.g. if someone breaks the Ramadhan fast, Will we label it as a sin? Never, first of all know whether it has broken or not, if really broken then look at the circumstances then decide. Without thinking with broad spectrum, we can not differentiate even between “Halal” & “Haram”. This paralysed thinking is the only cause of division of Islam into various sections. It must be remembered that “Halal” is not always “Halal” and vice versa e.g. I am not at all sorry to say as in Holy Quran the sexual intercourse between husband and wife is “Halal” but “Haram” in the state of menses and fasting. Marriage and divorce are opposite to each other but both are “Halal” There are many other similar examples. Decision-making is not a one-window operation, you must have asked me first to clear the things if you were unable to understand. I have been objected to explain all those in the imagination only but I say that for example, if someone openly says that he has seen God, still we have no right to say one a blasphemer. Moreover he may be right due to extreme of his love to God due to the delusions and it must be remembered that these delusions (as medical term) are involuntary and never a part of malingering, so God can do for one’s pleasure (please do not take it serious, it is just an example). The charge of blasphemous is a biggest decision. We are not allowed to pay such words even to the real blasphemer but alas! It is not a “Nura Kushti”(hit and trial) but a matter of “Pleasure or anger of God”, “Sin or reward”, and “Paradise or hell” which is not at all the right of any person but God. Hence you have taken the powers of God in your own hand, Naubbillah. You must do “Taoba” and seek refuge. Sometime some mistake absorbs all the rewards and vice versa. On the other hand the assignment given in the discussion is a sort of research work and the research can not complete without the required data. This was just like a scientific approach and “Speaking to Hazrat Musa shows that” and all others are parts of the data, not the conclusion of the research which is impossible to prove even with help of the latest technology and even after thousands of years and this is not the domain of any Newton, Einstein or Archimedes. If you really mean that these words must never be used even in the data as a way of regards to God then I do admit, “ I am wrong”(but still no blasphemous) and apology to God otherwise we remember Him daily as “Samee (one who hears)” “Baseer (one who sees)” and He likes it so much that we seek help by remembering Him with these names. Please differentiate clearly also between data and conclusion. We are not supposed to prove and reach the conclusion, therefore we are ordered clearly to believe blindly (Baqra-3) that I have already pointed out and this is the height of the believers. In the end it is summarized as “I have expressed God in the imagination only but you have taken the powers of God in your own hands, Naubbillah”. Now my question is to you “Who is more guilty?” But do not worry God is with us and I believe that we both are not guilty because our intentions are transparent (Hahith) and the only factor is the misinterpretation, most probably due a narrow field of thinking. I have already pointed out that it is not our domain to explore such matters because these have a lot of potential of irreversible complicated confusions (see above) So these are confusions not intentions but in spite of all the transparent intentions we both must do apology and seek refuge to please God who is “Ghafur-ur-raheem”, “Ghaffar” and loves His creatures, to add more to His pleasure leading to paradise, a place free of confusions and full of smiles; Insha’allah. May you enjoy His blessings and bounties everywhere and may He help and forgive all of us, Aameen! Dr. Akhlaq[/quote]
Mode
Prompt
Help
Basic
Check here to be notified by email whenever someone replies to your topic
Show Preview
Share
|
Copyright
Studying-Islam
© 2003-7 |
Privacy Policy
|
Code of Conduct
|
An Affiliate of
Al-Mawrid Institute of Islamic Sciences ®
Top