Powered by
UI
Techs
Home
>
Forums
>
>
General Discussion
>
Blood Transfusions
Post Reply
Username
Invalid Username or Password
Password
Format
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
1
2
3
4
5
6
Message Icon
Message
- Forum Code is ON
- HTML is OFF
Smilies
[quote]Peace and apologies for disappearin', as was on call for quite a few hrs which happened to b busy. I think technically the difference lies in the fact that eating blood means taking it down into stomach, which will then get digested and a part of it will enter the circulation, the rest being excreted as waste via kidneys and bowels. But more than this technical difference, again i understand that the question re. innate guidance comes in into this matter, as its under discussion at another forum at present re. edibles; it sounds wild and animal like to devour blood in that sense as an edible, which most likely will inculcate beastly attitudes in humans. Just like we train a child not even to push or kick someone as tomorrow he/she may start hitting/killing people once allowed to act agressively. As far as specifically forbidding consumption of "blood poured forth" only is concerned, i think, that is to give us some relaxation in the use of clotted blood which does remain in certain parts of slaughtered animals despite most of the blood being drained out after the major vessels of the throat have been incised; and which many of us like to eat i.e. liver, heart, etc. But this is my personal opinion as i thought about it while reading the relevant verses a while ago. Does anyone includin' the moderator find any sense in all this? SSaleem[/quote]
Mode
Prompt
Help
Basic
Check here to be notified by email whenever someone replies to your topic
Show Preview
Share
|
Copyright
Studying-Islam
© 2003-7 |
Privacy Policy
|
Code of Conduct
|
An Affiliate of
Al-Mawrid Institute of Islamic Sciences ®
Top