Studying Islam

Post Reply

Username

Invalid Username or Password

Password

Format

Message Icon

Message

- Forum Code is ON
- HTML is OFF

Smilies

[quote]Assalam o Alaikum,

Few days back, i read something really harsh on Maulana Maudoodi on a website. It was written as:

"Maudoodi has deviated from the traditional course of the eminent scholors of the Holy Quran. He has selected his own way against the whole Ummat. This is why the righteous Ulema have declared him a Heretic. [hl]His abnoxious criticism against the Prophets, Sahaba, Uleama and Mashaekh is a prominent feature of his writings[/hl] undermining the established authorities and inventing a new modern religion. Tafhimul Quran is an effort of his own imagination."

Now, don't you think that its too harsh..... I asked a question at that website to provide some reference why they are using such words and the reply i received is this:

[b]Maulana Maudoodi write in his pubilaction of Tafheem-ul-Quran Page 412 as under:
The truth is that this question causes another question, which is even more fundamental and important than this and that is [hl]whether Hazrat Yousaf was a prophet or not.[/hl] If he was a prophet then do we find such a concept about a prophet that he may offer his services to promote a system based on infidelity who himself claims to be a muslim. [hl]this question leads to another question, which is even more delicate and critical that whether Hazrat Yousaf was a righteous man or not?[/hl] If he was a righteous person then is it righteousness that on one side while he was behind te bar he started his prophetic mission and informed the egyptians that is that one Allah who is dominent on everything is not better then so many self-made gods? and that the king of the egypt is also one of such self-made gods, and openly clarify his mission that it is only one Allah who can ordain the rule the world over. [hl]but at the time of trial he himself becomes the most obedient servant of the Government and rather guard of the Government, which was ruling under the godliness of the king of egypt the root base of which is all the domination of the king & not Allah.[/hl]
[/b]

Now, i haven't verified it yet, but I am really shocked to read this reply. I can't even think that a such a renowned scholor is using such words for a Prophet. .

It was also mentiones in the mail that Maulana maudoodi have used such words for other Prophets and Sahaba. They also referred some books which I again haven't read.

I am also looking that someone can verify this, and if it is true then why Maulana Maudoodi is so much popular.

isn't it a strange & shocking info.

Please correct me if there is something wrong in this mail.

ALLAH Hafiz

Edited by: atifrafi on Monday, April 11, 2005 9:35 AM[/quote]

Mode

Check here to be notified by email whenever someone replies to your topic

Show Preview