Powered by
UI
Techs
Home
>
Forums
>
>
General Discussion
>
Hadiths.. reliable?
Post Reply
Username
Invalid Username or Password
Password
Format
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
1
2
3
4
5
6
Message Icon
Message
- Forum Code is ON
- HTML is OFF
Smilies
[quote][size=1][quote]first the title you choose is wrong i.e reliability of hadith.it gives impression that you are creating doubts in people mind about the hadiths and its authencity.[/quote][/size=1]Brother I agree w u. To me, one MUST know the Boundries & Scope of Hadith.[size=1][quote]i must tell you that people like bukhari, muslim, imamahmed were far more familiar with fanni-hadiths than the ulemas of 20th.century.they were more close to the period of prophet.mohammed(peace be upon him) than these so called ulemas.they never ever thought of adding something from their own in islam.[/quote][/size=1]Sorry Brother, I can't agree w u here. 1stly, It's NOT correct that only the CLOSNESS of those Scholars made them MORE FAMILIAR with Fann e Hadith. INFACT in the chain of Knowledge ALWAYS the CURRENT people have the LATEST knowledge.& 2ndly, WHAT is the PROOF with you that shows you that all Current Sholars are "so called ulemas".[size=1][quote]for your information initially there was full verse about rajm in Quran which was later removed but its hukm remained.[/quote][/size=1]for your information my dear Brother, your above Statement is Chellenging EVEN the Authencity of the Holy Quran. for Details Plz. Ist Go thru our Course "History of the Quran" & then Comment. may ALLAH keep all of us on right path.(amen)[/quote]
Mode
Prompt
Help
Basic
Check here to be notified by email whenever someone replies to your topic
Show Preview
Share
|
Copyright
Studying-Islam
© 2003-7 |
Privacy Policy
|
Code of Conduct
|
An Affiliate of
Al-Mawrid Institute of Islamic Sciences ®
Top