Studying Islam

Post Reply

Username

Invalid Username or Password

Password

Format

Message Icon

Message

- Forum Code is ON
- HTML is OFF

Smilies

[quote][quote]I can give you simple logical proof that Rashad Khalifah's followers' statements that Quran is corrupted with 2 extra verses is contradictory.

From verse 78 in Sura Waqia and other verses we know that the Quran is in Lauh-i-Mahfooz - a kind of a lock, and so it cannot be changed. This is Allah's gurantee to us, the Quran will not be changed.

Rashad Khalifah's followers' believe in the rest of Quran besides the two verses they reject - and the part they believe in includes the verses that say that Quran cannot be changed.

So they are contradicting themselves. If they say two verses were added, then that contradicts the claim in the other parts of the Quran they believe in that Quran cannot be changed!

If you believe them that the Quran was changed, then you will have to remove other verses also that claim Quran is in a lock.[/quote]

You have proved your point in a logical manner. I would like to draw the attention of all the participants to following two verses of Al Anam:

114. Say: "Shall I seek for judge other than Allah. - when He it is Who hath sent unto you the Book, explained in detail." They know full well, to whom We have given the Book, that it hath been sent down from thy Lord in truth. Never be then of those who doubt.

115. The word of thy Lord doth find its fulfilment in truth and in justice: [blue]None can change His words[/blue]: for He is the one who heareth and knoweth all.

The above arguments by Mr. Oosman and the above two verses of Al Anam, hopefully shall change the concept of Mr. Shamsher about the true meaning of Loh-e-Mehfooz.

Ijaz

Edited by: aijaz47 on Saturday, October 22, 2005 7:31 PM[/quote]

Mode

Check here to be notified by email whenever someone replies to your topic

Show Preview