|
|
Reflections |
|
In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Ever
Merciful |
‘Hey, the
Mike’s Comin’ !’
The whole town was excited
and so were ‘The Rings’. Originating as a youth club from a campus in the
suburbs, ‘The Rings’ was found at every place where there was an activity to
enjoy. Kim was somebody special out of the group - a leader leading from the
front on every occasion. Be it a concert or a cricket match, he could move
the masses like anything. And these days, Mike was coming. It wasn’t the
ordinary Mike in the street like every Tom, Dick and Harry. It was the
celebrated Michael Jackson -- the heartthrob of the millions. ‘The Rings’
was part of the whole entourage that was to welcome Mike when his plane
would land.
In the wake of all the hustle
and bustle, the clamour of news magazines, and the romance of the youth
groups that goes with such events, the day came -- Mike’s day. Amidst so
many excited people, Kim, with a look of a ‘mod-squad’ guy, was waiting for
the greatest hero of his age. The crowd was getting restless. It looked as
if it would give a tumultuous welcome to their dream-man.
And then the voice of the
airport staff mesmerized the air: ‘Attention please, the plane with Michael
Jackson has landed’. And the crowd went wild.
The place was reverberating
with the roars of the people. In a few minutes, the hero was there to be
seen with blinking eyes… ‘Yahoo! Here he is!’ one voice was heard. ‘What a
star he is!’ the other added. Overawed, Kim went ahead to embrace him. He
was about to touch the superstar when suddenly his eyes caught sight of
someone whom he could recognize in millions. He was his father’s mentor who
was on the same flight. But that was too superficial an introduction of a
person whose learning and knowledge could move the intellectual elite, a
rare specie belonging to the world of wisdom and scholarship. Had he been
born in the times of the great Caliph Hārūn al-Rashīd, he would have adorned
the throne of the emperor. But alas! He was living in the twentieth century,
a soul entrapped in an age when artists and sportsmen are the stars of all
human activity. They are the ideals of the new generation -- rather the
choice of the new generation.
Kim, though raised in a
learned family, somehow couldn’t follow the footsteps of his father -- a
father for whom the tradition of learning was something very sacred. But at
this very moment, his soul had unknowingly made him face the greatest ordeal
of his life. On one side, he was seeing Mike with all his glamour and on the
other, he was beholding the epitome of learning, the revered Kandhalvi from
Delhi, whose glowing forehead was relating a different story. In Mike was
the rare opportunity to revel in the joys of this world. In Kandhalvi was
something invaluably antique, a once in a lifetime feast. O Lord ! Show me
the right path. He had to decide on his destiny, he had to choose his
fortune. To be or not to be, that ‘became’ the question. He struggled
against the winds. And then he chose him. Yes, he surrendered himself,
surrendered himself before the truth. He moved to embrace him -- embrace
none other than Kandhalvi. He was free from the bondage, the bondage of the
lures of the world. Congrats! My Dear Kim. ... and this was the last time he
was seen with a pop mob.
Author:
Kamran Bashir Sheikh
URL:
http://www.monthly-renaissance.com/issue/content.aspx?id=507
|
|
In this
Issue |
|
Reflections
* 'Hey, the Mike's
Comin'!'
|
|
Read & Reflect
* Some Popular
Misconceptions of
the Muslims
|
|
Debate & Discuss * Discussion Forum:
The Directives of
Jihad
return
to the top ^
|
|
Express & Explain
*
General Discussion
Forum: Finality of
Prophet Muhammad?
return
to the top ^
Pause & Ponder
* Involvement
in the
Worldly Affairs
Announcements
*
"Quran for All" Series:
Surah Ghashiyah
Uploaded
*
Successful Participants
Recent Additions
* Youtube Video
(English & Urdu)
|
|
* Articles * Q n As
return
to the top ^
Spot on Site
return
to the top ^
|
|
Read and Reflect |
|
Some Popular
Misconceptions of the Muslims
Author: Dr Khalid
Zaheer
Individuals who stay away from practicing Islam despite being
Muslims fall into two broad categories: There is one group
whose apparent association with Islam owes itself entirely to
the accident of birth. They retain their Muslim names and
participate in some of the socially significant Islamic events
only to maintain their apparent Muslim identity. They are
neither convinced about the truthfulness of the message of
Islam nor are they interested in following it sincerely. Few
people would dispute the claim that their Muslim identity is
only a this-worldly arrangement and that on the Day of
Judgment their claim to Islam would be discarded.
The second category
consists of those people who take pride in acknowledging the veracity of Islam.
They make attempts to follow its teachings as far as convenience is not
threatened to be compromised. However, a closer look at their lifestyles reveals
that, much the same way as the first group, they too are in fact immersed in
their greed for their this-worldly life. Their practical contact with the
shari‘ah is strictly confined to the narrow limits allowed by the predominance
of their worldly objectives. Thus they care to follow only that part of Islam
which is consistent with the contemporary fashion or which at least does not run
contrary to its requirements. Their real happiness is associated with worldly
successes; they are genuinely grieved only over worldly privations. Despite this
completely “one-eyed” approach to life, they are fully convinced that the
exciting prospects of the other life too are, beyond doubt, going to be for them
to enjoy. Whatever be the truth about their motives, at least some of them
defend their approach by presenting arguments, some of which are apparently
based on the Qur’an and the Sunnah. It is important, therefore, that a
dispassionate analysis of those arguments be made to help them realize that the
superstructure of their expectations is based upon extremely fragile
foundations.
The gist of their
arguments is being presented below. People belonging to this category do not
generally present all the listed arguments. In fact, in most cases, it is only
one of the described reasons that is cited to absolve the individual from taking
the obligations of the shari‘ah seriously.
One popular
argument presented is that the most predominant attribute of Allah Almighty is
Mercy. How then is it possible that the Almighty is going to allow us to be
consigned to Hell when we are following at least some part of Islam along side
pursuing our worldly ambitions. Another argument offered is that since we have
the privilege of being the followers of the last and the favourite Prophet of
Allah (sws), and since it is a well known fact that Allah Almighty will grant to
his Prophet (sws) the right to intercede for his followers, how is it possible
that the Prophet’s intercession will not come to our rescue. Even if the sinning
side of our balance would be heavier, intercession of the Prophet (sws) will
make amends for that.
According to a
third argument, many traditions of the Prophet (sws) confirm that all those
people who had recited the kalimah1
shall enter Paradise, and that since we were born to Muslim families and got the
privilege of reciting the kalimah many times. Who then can deny us this
birth-right of ours. A little more reasonable amongst this group present a
seemingly more logical argument for the defence of their case. There is no
doubt, they say, that we are sinners and are violating Allah’s law on a fairly
regular basis, however, we do keep seeking His forgiveness during prayers and
even outside prayers. It is quite clear from the contents of the Qur’an and the
Sunnah that repentance cleanses one’s sins. After this knowledge, why should we
make our lives unnecessarily miserable by following all aspects of the shari‘ah.
What’s so wrong, after all, in a compromise between a this-worldly and a
that-worldly attitude?
Finally, there is
another argument presented: The shari‘ah has two types of injunctions: those
which are directly relevant to Allah and those that have to do with one’s
obligations towards fellow humans. While the latter category of injunctions are
more important to be followed, the obligations towards Allah are not. If we are
telling the truth, refraining from getting involved in bribes, helping the poor,
keeping our promises, and strictly adhering to other similar injunctions, why
then shall we not be successful in the Hereafter just for not saying prayers
regularly, or not fasting, or not going for hajj and not following similar
injunctions which are matters of personal relevance between the individual and
his God. When scales are going to be drawn on the Day of Judgement, how is it
possible that our significantly important good deeds will not be able to
outweigh the relatively less important blemishes.
Let us analyze
these arguments to find out whether they do merit the confidence of those who
are using them for justifying their life patterns or not.
More at
URL :
http://www.monthly-renaissance.com/issue/content.aspx?id=37
|
|
Debate and Discuss: |
|
|
Discussion Forum:
The Directives of Jihad
Topic: Forcing to Islam, Right or Wrong?
Kaiser5
This course said
that the Almighty's scheme in this world is to test man by giving him the
right to freely chose his religion. Can u please provide me with verses from
the Qur'an or Hadiths that led to this conclusion? Another thing, it says that
Jihad to spread the truth or force Islam on others isn't our job but that of
the prophets b/c unbelievers deliberately deny it. Again, i need to be
provided with verses or ahadiths that led to this conclusion.
And my question here is, forcing Islam by
persecution or any other violent way on other non-Muslims right or wrong?
Please use verses or ahadiths to prove it. Me personally, I think its wrong
but i see a lot of people in the Muslim world that try to force Islam on
non-Muslims through violent ways and consequently tarnish Islam's image. And i
can't stop wondering as to where they got the idea that they need to force it
on others. Furthermore, can Jihad apply from Muslims against other Muslims
that persecute non-Muslims ? Thanks, your answers will be much appreciated!
Abdullah Rahim (Moderator)
Thanks for your question.
1. The verse 2:256 sets a general rule about
freedom of choice when it comes to religion. Every other verse and every
Hadith has to be seen and interpreted with this verse (as a principle) in
mind:
"There is no compulsion in relation to His
religion: The right path has now become completely distinct from the erroneous
ones. Therefore, whoever rejects the arrogant [Satan] and believes in God, he
indeed has gripped a firm handle that shall never break apart. And God is
all-hearing, all-knowing." (2:256)
Accordingly, no one can attempt to force others
into Islam. Those Muslims who believe otherwise should explain how they
justify their belief in the light of the above verse of the Qur'an. Also
rationally they need to justify how it is possible to call some one Muslim
when the person only behaves like a Muslim to remain safe and unharmed while
in his heart he is not convinced about Islam.
2. You asked for an evidence from the Qur'an that
says "Jihad to spread the truth or force Islam on others isn't our job but
that of the prophets b/c unbelievers deliberately deny it".
The module does not say that. It says:
"once the truth is communicated to the addressees
of a Messenger to the extent that none of them is left with an excuse to deny
it and they still deliberately deny it, then they are punished in this very
world by the Almighty in either of the following two ways:
i. through natural calamities like storms and
earthquakes
ii. through the swords of the believers".
The Jihad you are referring to is not to force
people to religion, but is in fact the punishment of God that is taken place
through the swords of believers, after giving enough ultimatum, against people
who are convinced about the truth but do not accept it because of their
arrogance.
With regard to Jihad (that in this context
basically means attempting to kill others), we first need to bear in mind a
general rule of the Qur'an about killing:
"Whoever killed even a single soul - not being a
punishment of murder neither that of spreading unrest in the land - is as if
he killed the whole of mankind." (5: 32)
Accordingly only two reasons for killing can be
justified, these are punishment of murder and punishment of those who spread
unrest in the land.
While Jihad against persecution can be justified
in the light of the above rule, Jihad to force them to accept a religion will
not be online with the above.
Therefore any one who claims that we can kill
people in an attempt to force them to accept religion needs to justify how
this can be seen as punishment for either unjust murder or spreading unrest in
the land, referring to verse 5:32 .
There can only be exception from the above rule
for those who have special permission from God to carry out Jihad for another
reason (other than curbing persecution).
This special permission is only given to the
Prophet (sws) and his companions:
If you read the beginning of the Sura of Taubah
you will see how the verses in this particular chapter of the Qur'an (as an
example) relate to the time and the direct addressees of the Prophet (sws).
Again if any one claims that these verses are
addressing all Muslims of all time then the burden will be on him to reason
how he has come to this conclusion.
It is referring to this very rule of God's
punishment through his Messengers (and his direct followers) that we read in
the Qur'an:
"Indeed those who are opposing Allah and His
Messenger are bound to be humiliated. The Almighty has ordained: ‘I and My
Messengers shall always prevail’. Indeed Allah is Mighty and Powerful.
(58:20-1)
Also:
“Fight them and God will punish them with your
hands.” (9:14)
3. The word “Fitna” that is used in the Qur'an
has a general meaning of “persecution”. Therefore we do not have any reasons
to introduce limiting conditions for Jihad against persecution, on the basis
of people involved being Muslims or Non-Muslims.
Yes even if a non-Muslim group is being
persecuted by Muslims, other Muslims with the directive of their respective
state may start Jihad against those oppressing Muslims.
Please do let me know if this needs further
clarification.
|
|
Express and Explain: |
General
Discussion Forum:
Finality of Prophet Muhammad?
I want some help from those Muslims who
believe there is no Prophet after Muhammad.
Firstly, I quoted this posts
1. I cannot quote any Mufassir but I can
quote an important Hadith in which the prophet himself said about his son
Ibraheem (who died). He said. If he had lived he would have surely been a
Siddique Prophet. (the exact words I have I will have to check up)
2. Hazrat Aisha r.a. said, "O, people, Say
that he ({rophet) is Khatam an Nabiyyeen. And do not say there is no
prophet after him"
3. Every well known scholar agreed that our
prophet Muhammad s.a.w.s. is the last prophet in the sense that no law
bearing prophet will come after him to replace his law. In that sense,
they believed that he is the last law bearing prophet. (Shah Waliullah
Dehlavi included in those scholars and also Shaikh Akbar Moheyuddin
Undlusi also, and Imam Mulla Ali Qari Hanafi).
4. It is agreed that Hazrat Muhammad is the
last law bearing prophet ( Shariyat walla Nabi).
5. There is a Hadith too which goes like
this:
The prophet s.a.w.s. said " If Musa and Isa
were living today, they would have no excuse except to follow in my
footsteps." Meaning they would have to follow my Shariyat.
(Tafseer ibne Katheer Urdu vol 1, p85, )
(Tafseer ibne katheer on footnote of Tafseer
fatah al Bayan.)
( Al Yawaqeet wa Al Jawaher by Imam Abdul
Wahhab al Sh'irani vol 2 page 20)
Later I would check up the names of all those
who gave opinion that now only law bearing prophet is forbidden.
Now in the end, I remember that Imam of
Hadith, Imam Tirmidhi said, " People say Muhammad is the last prophet...
That is the idea of the foolish (Jahil) people... That is not a good
meaning of the khatam an nabiyeen...."
Brothers and Sisters i need some scholarly
response from you to above post.
Muhammad is
the last prophet not the last messenger. Open and read the Quran, you will
surely find the proof.
ibrahim (Moderator)
quote:
Muhammad is the last prophet not the last messenger.
Do you know
that only a Prophet is made a messenger i.e. Prophethood is the basic
requirement for a messenger. [see19: 51& 54]
So, if it's announced that Prophet Muhammad
pbuh was the Last Prophet of God, it's obvious that he was the Last
Messenger as well.
|
|
Pause
and Ponder: |
|
|
Terrorism or Jihad
Posted on: Sunday,
January 18, 2009 - Hits: 138
Question:
The concept of Jihād
is greatly misunderstood. Unfortunately, a number of terrorist organizations
(claiming to be Islamic) have used Jihād to justify their cowardly acts of
terrorism. Please explain in the light of Qur'ān and Sunnah.
Answer:
You are absolutely
right here. Quite unfortunately, Jihād has become one of the most misunderstood
directives of Islam. The following points about it may help in clarifying the
stance of Islam:
First and foremost, only an Islamic state has the
authority to launch Jihād. No group or organization has been given the right to
start an armed struggle in a society in any way.
Secondly, apart from self-defence (which is an
entirely different matter) the only legitimate reason for an Islamic State to
launch Jihād is to curb oppression and persecution in any other country --
whether Muslim or non-Muslim.
Thirdly, the Jihād carried out by the Prophet (sws)
and his companions after him was governed by a specific law meant only for the
Prophets of Allah and the nation towards which they are directly assigned. It
has nothing to do with us.
wassalam
Shehzad Saleem
see:
http://www.studying-islam.org/querytext.aspx?id=780
return
to the top ^
|
|
|
Announcements: |
|
"Quran
for All" Series: Surah Ghashiyah Uploaded
After Surah
Mulk, Surah Qalam, Surah Haaqqah,Surah Ma'aarij, Surah Nuh, Surah Jinn, Surah
Muzzammil, Surah Muddaththir, Surah Qiyamah, Surah Dahr, Surah Mursalat, Surah
Naba, Surah Nazi'aat, Surah Abas, Surah Takweer, Surah Infitar, Surah Mutaffifin,
Surah Inshiqaq, Surah Buruj, Surah Tariq and Surah A'laa, we have uploaded Surah
Ghashiyah in the "Quran for All" series.
The "Quran for All" Series is a software for
understanding the meanings of the Quran for those who do not have any knowledge
of Arabic but are able to read the Qur'an.
Remember in order to study Surah Ghashiyah one must
first study Surah Mulk and then other surahs in the sequence that they occur in
the Quran and are also provided in the software in this sequence.
Admn Off
Successful Participants
|
ID |
Course
Name |
Country |
Grade |
|
32 |
The Prayer |
Philippines |
B+ |
|
9778 |
Preaching Islam |
USA |
B |
|
10349 |
Hajj and 'Umrah |
USA |
B+ |
|
10349 |
Preaching Islam |
USA |
A+ |
|
10548 |
Understanding
Islamic Political Directives |
Azerbaijan |
D |
|
10585 |
Islamic Customs
and Etiquette |
USA |
D |
|
10585 |
Norms of Gender
Interaction |
USA |
D |
|
10673 |
Family and Marriage: Core Issues |
Egypt |
C+ |
|
10684 |
The Prayer |
UK |
C+ |
|
10688 |
Arrangement of the Qur'an |
Pakistan |
B+ |
|
10693 |
Arrangement of the Qur'an |
UK |
E+ |
|
10693 |
The Religion of Islam |
UK |
E+ |
|
10706 |
Norms of Gender Interaction |
USA |
B+ |
|
10706 |
Understanding Islamic Dietary Laws |
USA |
A+ |
|
10716 |
The Religion of Islam |
USA |
C |
r
|
|
Recent
Additions: |
|
Youtube Videos
E nglish
Urdu
Articles
QnA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot on Site :
|
|
Islamic Funsite for Kids
http://www.muslimkidsville.com/
return
to the top ^
|
|
|
|
|
Please give us your valued feedback on our guestbook: http://www.studying-islam.org/guestbook.aspx |
|
|
|
|
______________________ |
|
|
Studying Islam
51-K Model Town Lahore 54700 Pakistan Ph: 92-42-586 5145, 92-42-583 4306
Fax: 92-42-586 4856 URL: www.studying-islam.org | |