|
Reflections |
In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Ever Merciful |
Taming and Tongue
“Wounds inflicted by the tongue are
deeper than the wounds inflicted by the sword,” is an adage that we have often
read and also experienced. These wounds cut deep into the heart and are not
easily cured. Even after years, a person may feel their pain. At times, these
wounds are caused inadvertently and at others in a planned and cold-blooded way.
However, whatever be their nature as human beings it is our foremost duty to
make an all out effort to tame the tongue.
Abusing and cursing others, making fun of them, lying, misreporting facts,
backbiting, slandering others, swearing false oaths and bearing false witness,
lustful chatting, bragging, enticing others to sin, speaking disrespectfully,
expressing arrogance, gossiping, giving sweeping statements and being
judgemental, teasing, flattering and even talking incessantly are some prominent
areas where restraining and containing the tongue is required.
The first step to overcome such blemishes is to realize that they are blemishes.
Realizing faults means that the job is half done. The other half requires a
concerted and sustained effort.
The starting point after this realization is to plan before hand to hold back
the tongue from its evil habits or letting it enter into a frenzied state; more
often than not, this is due to some reaction that arises within us. Obviously,
blemishes of the tongue can be classified in two categories.
Blemishes which are habitual and do not involve rage: like lying, backbiting and
misreporting facts etc.
Blemishes which occur in rage, like abusing, screaming and shouting.
Blemishes of the tongue which are habitual need a concerted effort. They can
only be overcome if a person makes up his mind to root them out by realizing
that they are grave sins and not only besmear one’s inner-self but many a time
cause hurt, deceit and damage to others. These blemishes are a shame to
humankind and bring disrepute to it. We should first of all enlist all these
blemishes and work out a plan to eradicate them one by one. We should pray to
God to prod and intimate us right before we commit some blemish of the tongue
and then the courage and strength to overcome it. Being prodded is essential
because in blemishes committed as a habit we often are not even aware of what we
are doing. The next step is to apply brakes. This needs will power to stop short
of entering the highway that leads to excesses of the tongue. It may not work
every time and it is not meant to work every time. We are not angels and neither
can we ever be. We have to realize that we cannot be good all the time. However,
we must be good most of the time. The first target is not humanly achievable;
the second one is and it is to realize it that we should work for. A daily plan
of self-accountability is needed for improved results. We must take time out
every day to think over the blemishes we have committed with our tongues in the
previous twenty four hours and then resolve to do better in the next twenty four
hours.
Blemishes of the tongue which occur in rage need prior planning as well. When
overcome with rage, we need to delay our reaction. Merely deferring our response
at that time can go a long way in reducing the harm caused. Inhaling a deep
breath, taking a glass of water, changing one’s posture or location can help a
lot. If our anger is caused by some person, we need should try bring to mind the
good qualities in that person. We can vent our rage by uttering whatever we have
in mind in seclusion. Fasting helps to restrain rage and hence the misuse of the
tongue. Even after adopting all these measures, it will still take time to
overcome this habit and it will not go overnight. So during this time if one
does lose temper and is not able to restrain his or her tongue, then one thing
that should be persistently done in offering an unconditional apology to the
aggrieved party.
Author:
Dr Shehzad Saleem
URL:
http://www.monthly-renaissance.com/issue/content.aspx?id=1356
|
In this Issue |
Reflections
* Taming & Tongue
|
Read & Reflect
* Religious Tolerance:
The Islamic
Perspective
|
Debate & Discuss * Discussion Forum:
Understanding
Islamic Political
Directives
return
to the top ^
|
Express & Explain
*
General Discussion
Forum:
Terrorist vs
Terrorism
return
to the top ^
Pause & Ponder
* Should
Muslim
Women Talk
from behind a
Veil
Announcements
* Courses
on Surah
Nasr, Surah Kafirun
Launched
* Successful
Participants
Read and Reflect |
Religious Tolerance: The Islamic Perspective
Mankind seems to be divided by
religious categorisation. Some religious groups are more exclusive in their
approach than others. However, the approach of condemning people belonging to
other faiths, although it has become a much less pronounced problem in recent
times, has not vanished completely.
There have been many approaches
adopted by religious scholars belonging to different faiths to check the
tendency of growing bigotry amongst religious people. The Vatican adopted the
policy of Religious Inclusivism through its decree of 1967 which expressed
sentiments of cordiality for other important world religions. Words of sympathy
were also reserved in the decree for those who have chosen to follow the
approach of atheism.
There are, however, some
Christians scholars who believe that Religious Inclusivism, even though it is a
welcome improvement on Religious Exclusivism, still falls short of being fully
convincing. What has been presented by William Rowland, John Hick, and Paul
Badham is an approach to justify what they describe as Religious Pluralism.
According to this approach, all important religions are genuine human responses
to the same Transcendental Reality, even though influenced by the respective
cultural environments of the religious leaders. Thus all of them are
simultaneously correct, and all offer important insights into the understanding
of the Ultimate.
Both Religious Inclusivism and
Religious Pluralism promise more religious tolerance amongst those who choose to
adopt these points of view, although the latter seems to be more capable of
engendering true respect in the hearts of believers of one faith for the
believers in the other faiths.
Muslims have normally been
considered Religious Exclusivists, who would not hold people of other faiths
worthy of being offered respect for their religious commitments. There is,
therefore, felt a need to present an Islamic point of view on how Islamic
teachings propose to tackle the issue of religious plurality.
Islam, on the one hand takes a
firm position in confirming the unquestionable authenticity of its teachings, on
the other hand it also calls for genuine respect for all non-Muslims. Even
though there seems to be apparently a contradiction in the approach, a better
understanding of the various verses of the Qur’ān on the subject would suggest
that it is not necessarily so.
The correct Islamic approach
towards the non-Muslims is to assume that all of them have, as yet, not been
properly convinced about the authenticity of the divine origins of the teachings
of Islam. It is for the Muslims to help the non-Muslims to appreciate the
truthfulness of the Islamic teachings. That would require not only intelligent
preaching on their part but, perhaps more importantly, a behaviour of respect
for the fellow human beings, irrespective of their faith. The absence of that
behaviour on the part of some Muslims has been an important reason for their
failure to present Islam as a message which is worthy of being taken seriously
by the non-Muslims. Thus true religious tolerance is at the heart of a proper
Islamic behaviour. Thus it will be shown that all Muslims are required to be
extremely tolerant of other faiths and to continue their struggle to convince
them politely.
This approach is neither
Religious Inclusivism of the sort adopted by the Vatican, nor Religious
Pluralism as proposed by Rowland Williams, John Hick, and Paul Badham. It is, in
fact, a call for religious tolerance because of the possibility of lack of
proper communication of the true message of God. Since no body knows whether the
other individual has been communicated the message of Islam properly, therefore,
no Muslim has the right to condemn any non-Muslim on grounds of religious
differences.
Author:
Dr Khalid Zaheer
URL:
http://www.monthly-renaissance.com/issue/content.aspx?id=572
|
|
Debate and Discuss |
Discussion Forum:
Understanding Islamic Political Directives
Topic:
Module 4: Democracy and Islam
Siddiq
Bukhary(Moderator)
Why do you think it is
necessary not to accept a hadith unless it meets the criteria ascertained by
the scholars of the science of the hadith? Does a Hadith become absolute truth
after it is rendered acceptable by the scholars of the science of Hadith?
perv1
None
saqi12345
Is it a comparison between contemporary western democracy and Islamic
political system as outlined in the Quran and the Sunnah duly followed by four
caliphs of Islam?
askhalifa
1. In Islamic political system, law making authority cannot cross the boundary
of Quran and sunnah, where as there is no such restriction in democracy in
general.
2. In Islamic political system choice of a ruler is based on consensus of
either intellectuals or masses, where as in current democratic system choice
of ruler is based on selection of majority.
perv1
1. Democracies are governed in general by constitution. In an Islamic system
the Quran would form the constitution. If however the majority decided to have
laws contrary to the Quran. Then it cannot be considered to be an Islamic
state. Ultimately the majority have to decide whether they wish to live within
Islamic bounds or not. As there is no compulsion in religion no one should
force their will on the majority.
2.'In Islamic political system choice of a ruler is based on consensus of
either intellectuals or masses, where as in current democratic system choice
of ruler is based on selection of majority'
Democracy is based on consensus of the masses.
Who exactly are the intellectuals.
saqi12345
1. the views expressed by perv1 at point 1 is the correct stand on the issue.
2. the question raised by perv1 at point 2 is logical.
as per Islamic teachings, the principal "the system is based on consultation"
has no discrimination of intellectuals and otherwise. matter of public
interest will be decided by "the majority opinion of the masses" is the common
point between Islam and democracy. however , the difference between the two
systems is sufficiently covered at point 1 by perv1.
Siddiq
Bukhary (Moderator)
Saqi has correctly summarised the subject . I hope, now there is no ambiguity
in this matter.
|
|
Express and Explain: |
General
Discussion Forum:
Terrorist vs Terrorism
According to British
writer and lecturer, Karen Armstrong, the west is deeply Islamophobic and the
Islamophobia is the result of a long process of prejudice, dating back to the
Crusades. The recent events have strengthened the prejudiced belief that “Islam
is the religion of the sword”. Islamophobia can manifest itself directly in
verbal or physical attacks on Muslims but also indirectly in negative images of
Muslims presented by the media. Islamophobia was worsened by anti-Islamic
policies, publications and activities in Europe and the US. Islamophobia is not
only a cause of discrimination against Muslims but also an open threat to world
peace. The western media and intellectuals play a significant role in spreading
Islamophobia. Hate-mongers have come out of the woodworks in full force. Now,
not a day passes without the newspapers, magazines, radio and TV talk shows,
Hollywood movies, computer games and even children’s cartoons and the myriad of
internet websites and chat rooms, attacking Islam and Muslims. Muslim
communities in the western world and its so called leaders have taken the
Ostrich-approach. They have buried their heads in the sand hoping the problems
would go away. It is not going to go away. The neck of the Ostrich will be cut.
Entire Muslim communities living in the west are under attack. According to a
survey, 70% of Americans do not want to see Muslims living in their
neighborhood. There is not a single day when Islam and Muslims are not attacked
by the mainstream news media outlets. Muslims are referred barbarians who must
either be civilised or banished before they pollute the egalitarian societies in
which they were born or now live. According to a survey in Scotland, half of
Scots see Muslims as a ‘cultural threat’. Scotland would lose its identity if
more Muslims went to live there. According to DEMOS, British public is more
worried about violent crime and immigration, but the British establishment has
focused too heavily on terrorism.
Masajid and Muslim organizations are regarded as
training centers for terrorists. Thousands of innocent Muslim youths are being
searched in streets and hundreds of them are behind the bar with out any trial.
No religion advocates terrorism. However, West has directed its anger against
Islam and Muslims by inventing Islamic Terrorism. It is the western extremism
which is portraying Islam as an evil. It is the extremism in France, Turkey and
other European countries where Muslim women are not allowed to cover their
heads. Now the Turkish education chief wants headscarf ban lifted. In Britain,
there is a social and economic pressure on Muslim women not to cover their
heads. Despite international outrage and the US authorities’ own stated wish to
close Camp Guantanamo is still holding detainees illegally… in cruel, inhuman
and degrading conditions.
There is an undeclared World War III going on in
the name of War on Terrorism. The fact of the matter is that Islam is all peace
and hence this war is war of terrorism and not against terrorism. Deception and
lies are frequently part of the wars and with powerful Hollywood film tools and
other media communications devices people of the world are thoroughly fooled,
deceived and made confused. The war in Iraq and Afghanistan is an unmitigated
disaster that had brought the west generally into disrepute. Inter Milan, the
Italian foot-ball team played with an Istanbul team, wearing a strip with
“Crusader-Style” red crosses which is offensive to Muslims. The red-cross brings
to mind one thing: the symbol of the “Templar Knights”. The cross also
symbolised “western racist superiority over Islam”. Inter Milan had manifested
in the most explicit manner the superiority of one religion over another. Many
EU countries are against Turkey joining EU on the ground that majority of Turks
are Muslims with secular constitution. Widespread ignorance and Right-wing
groups is the main culprit behind the demonized image of Islam in the west.
Islamophobic west has become politically motivated. Western media and
politicians are portraying Muslims as “satanic figures”. A recent British study
has found that a torrent of negative and imbalance stories in the British media
demonize the sizeable Muslim minority and their faith by spreading prejudices
and portraying them as the enemy within. Many people in the west, including
researchers and those working in the media, unintentionally provide a blemished
image of Islam because they are ignorant about Islam and Muslims. The
republication of Danish cartoons clearly shows the prevalent ignorance about
Islam. The United Nation wanted to introduce a universal law to protect Muslims
from Islamophobia, which is spreading like wildfire, but the so-called civilised
western establishments, voted against it. It is the fundamental duty of Muslims
settled in the west to raise awareness of the spirit and core of Islam.
One by one all Muslim Organizations are going to be
classified as ‘Terrorists’. BBC Newsnight has already branded world Assembly of
Muslim Youth (WAMY) as terrorist. According to TES, dated 1st Feb2002, Muslim
teacher’s website has been condemned for links to militant Islamic groups. It is
absurd to brand Muslim teachers website as a terrorist. Its aim is to provide
guidance, share experience and discuss every day issues and problems facing
Muslim teachers. It is also going to help British teachers to learn to respect
and understand Islamic culture and most misunderstood British Muslim community.
Racism in schools is alive and well was recognized by the Focus Institute on
Rights. Staff in many schools is unwittingly racist but in my view, all British
teachers are chicken racist. Racism is rife in National Curriculum. There is no
mention of Muslim contribution in the world. Schools reinforce the racism that
has been promulgated for centuries. The curriculum is supposed to encourage
respect for different nationals, religious and ethnic identities and encourage
pupils to challenge injustice. A report on teachers from the minority
communities found that racism coupled with a lack of support and career
progression is holding some back. Even teacher trainees were encountering racism
at placement schools. They would like to discuss their worries more, but only if
the senior management team was visibly open and supportive. The management at
schools was very defensive about any mention of racism, so the issue could not
be discussed in any meaningful way. If a teacher in English school calls a teddy
bear Jesus Christ, there would be seriously hostile comments in much of the
media. While in Sudan a British teacher was tried and imprisoned for insulting
Islam for fifteen days but was pardoned by the President and released after
eight days. She said after her release that she encountered nothing but kindness
and generosity from Sudanese people. She was treated well in a Government Villa
instead of a prison cell. She could have been imprisoned for six months and
forty lashes. It is a fact that British teachers have no respect for Islamic
faith and subsequently Muslim community, according to research by the University
of Derby.
All the Masajid and Muslim organizations are there
for humanitarian, educational and youth works. None of them promotes acts of
terrorism or support so called Islamic Terrorism. They are busy in those aspects
of education, which are neglected by state schools. They satisfy the needs and
demands of the Muslim children and teenagers, which were denied by state schools
and LEAs. Without their support and guidance the young generation of Muslim
would have lost its Islamic Identity crucial for mental, emotional and
personality development. Their contribution will be more effective if all Muslim
pupils attend Muslim schools with Muslim teachers. It will help to develop
positive co-relation between school and home resulting in raising the standard
of education of future Muslim generations. For this purpose, I have a
proposition that those state schools where Muslim pupils are in majority may be
designated as Muslim Community Schools, managed and controlled by Muslim
Educational Trusts and Charities. They are in a better position to educate
Muslim children according to their needs and demands. A study by the National
Foundation for Educational Research confirmed that all faith schools had better
results than their secular counterparts. Conservative spokesman on education has
praised schools affiliated to religious groups, saying Muslim schools deserved
“support” not suspicion.
student1
It is true brother
because their are extremist elements in the US and UK government that hate Islam
and their aim is to misguide the people of the West about Islam because they are
scared that one day this religion will take over their countries and their
position will be in danger.
This same "Islam" is the one that brought positive
changes in the world during Medival Times and showed a new direction to the
world and now this unfortunate religion is under attack.
One of the main problems is that we should work on
our side to promote the true teachings of Islam and should convince Westerns and
explain them the true teachings of Islam.
Let me tell you brother, West has the potention to
convert to Islam but all we need is to become a symbol of Islam for them because
they themselves are fed-up of their corrupt and free society and offcourse they
are looking for solutions and Islam is the only solution for them.
Don't think that all the Westerns are against Islam
,their are many sensible people who know about Islam and do not believe what
their media propagates about Islam.
imran776
If we leave aside
these westerners, even we Pakistanis including myself are moved by the current
situation in Pakistan.
Leaving aside all the outside/foreign elements we
need to bring our house in order first and everything will be all right
inshallah.
See:
http://www.studying-islam.org/forum/topic.aspx?topicid=2875&lang=&forumid=1
|
|
Pause
and Ponder |
Should Muslim Women Talk
from Behind a Veil?
Posted on: Monday,
May 31, 2010 - Hits: 2
Question:
33:53 mentions that women must
speak to men from behind a curtain. Please explain.
Answer:
As far as 33:53 is concerned. it
specifically concerns the house of the Prophet (sws) as is evident from the
context. The context shows that the hypocrites at one time in Madīnah had
started raising scandals against the wives of the Prophet (sws). They would also
suddenly barge into the house of the Prophet (sws) trying to catch the wives
unaware and thereby try to scandalize their private lives. To safeguard against
these scandal mongers, the Qur’ān directed the wives to take certain
precautionary measures. The wives of the Prophet (sws) were told that they
should take care that whenever they have to say something to people in whose
hearts there is the ailment of lewdness, they should speak without showing any
softness to them:
O Wives of the Prophet! You are not
like other women. If you fear Allah do not be too complaisant of speech lest one
in whose heart is a disease should be moved with desire. (33:32)
Speaking from behind a curtain was
another such measure, as the Qur’ān says:
If you ask his wives for anything,
speak to them from behind the curtain. That is purer for your hearts and theirs.
(33:53)
Likewise, people who would assemble
in the house of the Prophet (sws) were also directed to observe certain manners.
They were told that they should not become a source of trouble for the residents
of the house by coming at the wrong time or unnecessarily prolonging their stay.
In the words of the Qur’ān:
O you who believe! enter not the
Prophet’s dwellings unless permission be granted to you for a meal [and] not [so
early as] to wait for its preparation. But if you are invited, enter and when
you have eaten disperse. Linger not for conversation. Such behavior distresses
the Prophet and he shows his regard for you but of the truth Allah does not have
regard for anything. (33:53)
So you can see that these directives
have a specific background and cannot be extended to general application.
wassalam
Shehzad Saleem
URL:
http://www.studying-islam.org/querytext.aspx?id=926
|
|
Announcements: |
Courses on
Surah Nasr and Surah Kafirun Launched
salam (peace)
One modular course on
Surah Nasr, and Surah Kafirun has just been launched.
Those interested may register
Regards
The Team of Studying Islam
Successful Participants
ID |
Course |
Country |
Grade |
15411 |
Belief in the Hereafter |
USA |
A |
13927 |
Belief in the Prophets |
Swedan |
C+ |
15411 |
Family and Marriage:
Core Issues |
USA |
C+ |
14146 |
Introduction to the
Hadith |
Pakistan |
B |
13927 |
Norms of Gender
Interaction |
Swedan |
C |
13927 |
Surah Falaq |
Swedan |
C+ |
15279 |
Surah Falaq |
USA |
B+ |
13927 |
Surah Ikhlas |
Swedan |
B+ |
15279 |
Surah Ikhlas |
USA |
A+ |
15279 |
Surah Lahab |
USA |
A+ |
13218 |
Surah Nas |
UK |
A+ |
15279 |
Surah Nas |
USA |
D+ |
|
|
Recent
Additions: |
Youtube
Videos
English
Urdu
Articles
English
Urdu
QnA
English
Urdu
|
|
Spot on Site: |
History of the Qur'an
|
|
|
Please give us your valued feedback on our guestbook: http://www.studying-islam.org/guestbook.aspx
Studying Islam
51-K Model Town Lahore 54700 Pakistan
Ph: 92-42-5834306, 92-42-5865145, 92-42-5857528-29 Fax:
92-42-5864856
URL: www.studying-islam.org
Email: admin@studying-islam.org
|
| |