Newsletter (16th Jun'07 - 30th Jun'07)
(6/30/2007)



Fortnightly Newsletter

(16th-30th June`07)

 

www.studying-islam.org

Compiled by: Azeem Ayub

 

Reflections

 

In the Name of Allah,
the Most Gracious,
the Ever Merciful

 

 

To Humble before Knowledge

 

 

The traditional approach to education in Islamic Sciences is the most appealing to my mind. The teaching method of personal tutelage seems to fit not only the psychic structure of the students but also conforms to the spiritual make up of the teachers, who wish to transmit the invaluable treasure of knowledge. In the maze of insuperable enigmas, teachers guide their pupils how to find the way out. In the unfathomable ocean of delusional questions, they take their hands and swim to the surface to help them breathe clarity and certitude.

 

The tunnel of ignorance which the ‘toddlers’ are liable to trip up in is lit by the enduring flame fueled by the compassion of the teachers. As long as the ability to learn is accompanied by the insatiable desire for knowledge, the compassion remains in a perpetual state of burning. Despite the fact that many a time the teachers provide for the sustenance of their students, they do not feel crossed when their premises are dauntlessly questioned and their conclusions are audaciously challenged by their students. The more questions are debated, the more intensely the flame burns – and sheds light on the hitherto hidden aspect of the problem. Having a first hand knowledge of the personal inhibitions of students puts the teachers in a very favorable position vis-à-vis communication of knowledge is concerned. More often than not, an impregnable bridge soon comes into being to let the traffic of ideas moves about speedily in highly sophisticated parlance – which only aim at utmost precision and exactitude. The theme which was obscured in the mist of confusion, of surety, comes into the veritable sunlight.

 

The expedition of learning which begins by studying the scholarly masterpieces of the earliest great Muslims ends with the investigation of the works of the contemporary scholars. Each and every important sentence is debated, and the themes presented are voraciously devoured in sheer hunger of knowledge. Objective analysis and free inquiry into the sources signify the hallmark of this expedition. While this is done, time is taken to understand and appreciate the works, and due regards are paid to the authors. Whatever discipline is studied, the teacher stands at the focal point of this activity. To sit before him is to humble before knowledge – that always eludes the bigheaded and makes friends with the humble

 

_________________

 

 

Author: Jhangeer Hanif

 

Topic URL: May 2005 www.monthly-renaissance.com

 

In this Issue

Reflections
* To Humble before
    Knowledge
 

Read & Reflect
*
The Basic Premise
    of the Religion

 

 Debate & Discuss
Discussion Forum:
    Norms of Gender
    Interaction

 return to the top ^

Express & Explain
* General Discussion
   Forum:
how to
   act/react to Salman
   Rushdie's matter....

 
 return to the top ^ 

Pause & Ponder
* 
 Marriage with Step
     Daughters

 

 return to the top ^

Announcements

Successful
    Participants

 

Recent Additions
*  Articles
  
*  Q n As
 
   

   return to the top ^

  

Spot on Site

 

   return to the top ^

Read and Reflect:

 

The Basic Premise of Religion

 

Author:

Javed Ahmad Ghamidi

Tr. by Shehzad Saleem

 

 

The basic premise of religion is that this world has a creator; He has created this world as a trial; thus He has sent man in this world for a specific period of time; at the conclusion of this period, this world will necessarily end and its earth and heavens shall be replaced by a new earth and new heavens; a new world will then come into being. All mankind shall be raised up there and shall be rewarded or punished on the basis of their beliefs and deeds.

 

Religion requires us to accept this reality. Obviously, it is essential that such a reality be very well known to man. Consequently, from the very first day of creation the Almighty has made arrangements that no one should be able to deny this reality on the basis of knowledge and intellect, and this reality should remain so evident before people that those who deny it would not be able to present any excuse before the Almighty on the Day of Judgement.

 

Intuitive Evidence

How was this reality communicated to people such that they were not left with any excuse to deny it? The Qur’an informs us that an acknowledgement of the providence of the Almighty is found innately in man’s nature. It says that this matter manifested itself in the form of a pledge. The Qur’an refers to this event as a real-life incident and not something metaphorical. Since man has been sent here for trial, the whole incident has been erased from his memory; however, its essence is etched on his heart and ingrained in his soul and nothing can obliterate it. Consequently, if man is reminded of it in the absence of any hindrance in his surroundings, he leaps to it the way a child leaps to its mother even though it never saw itself emerge from her womb and is drawn towards her with such conviction as if it already knew her. A person feels that this pledge of his with the Almighty was the answer to a very natural need found within him. The Qur’an says that this testimony of man’s inner-self is so undeniable that as far as the providence of God is considered, man will be held accountable before God merely on the basis of this testimony:

 

وَإِذْ أَخَذَ رَبُّكَ مِن بَنِي آدَمَ مِن ظُهُورِهِمْ ذُرِّيَّتَهُمْ وَأَشْهَدَهُمْ عَلَى أَنفُسِهِمْ أَلَسْتَ بِرَبِّكُمْ قَالُواْ بَلَى شَهِدْنَا أَن تَقُولُواْ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ إِنَّا كُنَّا عَنْ هَذَا غَافِلِينَ  أَوْ تَقُولُواْ إِنَّمَا أَشْرَكَ آبَاؤُنَا مِن قَبْلُ وَكُنَّا ذُرِّيَّةً مِّن بَعْدِهِمْ أَفَتُهْلِكُنَا بِمَا فَعَلَ الْمُبْطِلُونَ  وَكَذَلِكَ نُفَصِّلُ الآيَاتِ وَلَعَلَّهُمْ يَرْجِعُونَ (٧: ١٧٢-١٧٤)

And remember when your Lord brought forth from the loins of the progeny of Adam their children and made them testify against themselves. He said: “Am I not your Lord?” They replied: “We bear witness that You are.” This We did lest you should say on the Day of Judgement: “We had no knowledge of that,” or present the excuse: “Our forefathers had already adopted idolatry and we later became their children so will You destroy us on account of what these false-doers did?” [We have fully explained things here] and thus do We explain Our revelations [so that people are left with no excuse to deny the truth] and so that they may return to the right path. (7:172-174)

 

Same is the case with good and evil. A person has innate knowledge of good and evil. The Qur’an says: وَنَفْسٍ وَمَا سَوَّاهَا فَأَلْهَمَهَا فُجُورَهَا وَتَقْوَاهَا  قَدْ أَفْلَحَ مَنْ زَكَّاهَا وَقَدْ خَابَ مَنْ دَسَّاهَا (٩١: ٧-١٠) (And the soul bears witness and the perfection given to it. Then [God] inspired it with its evil and its good, 91: 7-10). In some other verses of the Qur’an, this aspect is referred to by the words:  إِنَّا هَدَيْنَاهُ السَّبِيلَ (٧٦:٣) (We inspired in him the way of good and evil, (76:3)) and (١٠:٩٠)  وَهَدَيْنَاهُ النَّجْدَيْنِ (Have We not shown him both the paths? (90:10)). In the above quoted verses, the Qur’an has made it clear that just as the Almighty has blessed a person with eyes to see and ears to hear, similarly, he has blessed him with a moral faculty which distinguishes good and evil for him. This aspect of our soul as per which it can be called the reproaching soul which admonishes us like a preacher on an evil committed springs from this faculty. Thus we see that distinguishing good from evil and the awareness that good is good and evil is evil are universal realities which no one can deny. The Qur’an says that after this testimony of a person’s inner-self, no one can deny reward and punishment. It says:

 

لَا أُقْسِمُ بِيَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ وَلَا أُقْسِمُ بِالنَّفْسِ اللَّوَّامَةِ أَيَحْسَبُ الْإِنسَانُ أَلَّنْ نَجْمَعَ عِظَامَهُ بَلَى قَادِرِينَ عَلَى أَنْ نُسَوِّيَ بَنَانَهُ بَلْ يُرِيدُ الْإِنسَانُ لِيَفْجُرَ أَمَامَهُ يَسْأَلُ أَيَّانَ يَوْمُ الْقِيَامَة  فَإِذَا بَرِقَ الْبَصَرُ وَخَسَفَ الْقَمَرُ  وَجُمِعَ الشَّمْسُ وَالْقَمَرُ يَقُولُ الْإِنسَانُ يَوْمَئِذٍ أَيْنَ الْمَفَرُّ كَلَّا لَا وَزَرَ إِلَى رَبِّكَ يَوْمَئِذٍ الْمُسْتَقَرُّ يُنَبَّأُ الْإِنسَانُ يَوْمَئِذٍ بِمَا قَدَّمَ وَأَخَّرَ بَلِ الْإِنْسَانُ عَلَى نَفْسِهِ بَصِيرَةٌ وَلَوْ أَلْقَى مَعَاذِيرَهُ (٥٧ : ١ -٥ ١)

[They think that the Day of Judgement will never be]; By no means! I present as evidence the Day of Judgement itself. And [they think that the Day of Judgement is a far-fetched reality]. By no means! I present as evidence this reproaching soul [within you]. Does man think that We will not be able to bring together his bones? Why not? We can put together his very finger tips. [No this is not so]; in fact [the truth is that] man wants to be mischievous before his [conscience]. He asks: “When will the Day of Judgement be?” But on the day when the sight is dazed and the moon eclipsed and the sun and the moon brought together, this very man will say: “Whither to flee?” – No! there is no refuge now! Towards your Lord that Day is the resting place. On that Day will man be informed what he sent forth and what he left behind. [No, he cannot deny it]; in fact, he himself is a witness upon his own self however much he may put up excuses. (75: 1-15)

 

Imam Amin Ahsan Islahi, while explaining this argument of the Qur’an, writes:

 

Now the question is that if a person has a guardian within his conscience which chides him on every evil that emanates from him, then how can it be imagined that man will be not be held accountable for his deeds. Why would he go scot-free if he spends a life in whatever manner he wants to while negating the calls of his conscience? If a person will not be held accountable for his deeds, then where has this chiding conscience come into him from? If his Creator is unconcerned about the good and evil which emanates from him, then why and from where has He given him the feeling of being elated at a good deed and being pricked by his conscience at a bad one? Then from here another question arises: If God has set up a miniature court of justice in every person, then why will He not set up a greater court of justice which will hold the whole world accountable for good and evil which emanate from it and not reward and punish people accordingly? Any person who deliberates on these questions while disregarding his desires will reach the conclusion that the very being of a person bears witness that he has innate knowledge of good and evil; he will not be left unaccountable; there definitely shall come one day when he will be punished for any misdeeds he may have done and be rewarded for his good deeds. To remind a person of this very Day, the Almighty has placed a miniature court of justice within a person’s soul so that man does not remain indifferent to it, and if ever he becomes indifferent he can catch a glimpse of it by merely reflecting on his inner-self. It is this very reality which sages have taught us by saying that man is a miniature world and within this miniature world there is a reflection of the greater world. If a person has a true comprehension of his own self, he is able to comprehend both God and the Hereafter.[1]

 

Topic URL:  July 2007 http://www.monthly-renaissance.com/

 

Debate and Discuss:

 
 


Discussion Forum: Norms of Gender Interaction

 

Topic: Module 2 Using Perfumes

 

 

Jhangeer Hanif (Moderator)

What is the implication that the Holy Prophet forbade Muslim women to wear strong perfumes, when going outside.

 

Sweet16

Always pray that all of u brothers & sisters in ISlam are good by the grace of Allah (SWT).

From the answers I've collected from people, the following is what I got:

I'm sorry I don't really have a Hadith to support what I am saying and also I don't even think I deserve to answer this question since I'm a perfume user myself however, may we all change for the good as time passes by, Ameen.
 

Perfume whether strong or mild is Haraam in Islam because the majority of them contain Alcohol and using alcohol to nourish our body is forbidden. Also, I've also read that you wouldn't drink Alcohol right because it could kill you therefore why would you wear it on your body? However, this is not such a strong way to prove my point since there are some non-toxication alcohols as well. But from something I remember, it's not a hadith but in general it is said that things that may attract non-mehrams like make-up, tacky jewerlies should not be worn in public and perfume definetly falls in this category. I really hope my knowledge has made some difference and sense. I'm sure other sisters & brothers here know better. In my opinion, just don't use the things which you have doubts about...

Fi'amanillah

 

Jhangeer Hanif (Moderator)

Indeed, we improve day by day, insha Allah, if we set our eyes on the nobler ideals.

We need also to continue to gain knowledge as much as it relates to our daily affairs. I appreciate that you have replied to the post above. I would like you to please elaborate how drinking something and sprinkling it on dress can be equated.

 

Sweet16

The part where you have said that we must "gain knowledge as much as it realties to our daily affairs" has touched my heart and it is very true, something I really believe in as we all should too. Inshallah as soon as I collect more information on how drinking and sprinkling something like alcohol can be compared then I will provide you with the details ASAP.

 

jeffrey

Just a thought regarding the wearing of perfumes, fragrances, and the like.

 


It seems to me that if one follows modesty, and hence the glorification of Allah (SWT) then these applications would indeed be Haraam, since the result of their applications-on men or women-is generally to glorify either the wearer or the substance, and not Allah (SWT). And those applications which are alcohol based would seem to be Haraam, since alcohol is forbidden.

On the other hand, it seems to me that the application of soaps, even those resulting in mild fragrance, would be alright if the idea is to achieve cleanliness and to remove objectionable odors and not to advertise or glorify oneself or the application. So it is much in the intention of how the fragrance is used.


Shukran,

 

Jhangeer Hanif (Moderator)
Thank you for your feedback. I however do not understand how you say that perfumes are haraam. When we use perfumes we do not glorify ourselves against the Almighty like wearing a dress is not to glorify yourself contrary to God.


It needs to be remembered that Allah has warned us not to say that Zeenat is haraam that Allah has created for his men. (7:32) I understand that alcohol is forbidden for us to drink. However, nowhere it has been made unlawful to be used in perfumes because they do not intoxicate you.

And what do you think of perfumes that are bereft of alcohol?

 

jeffrey

I stand corrected regarding my comments that alcohol used for cosmetics is haraam-it's apparent to me that the Quran's references are to alcohol forbidden in consumption, as taken into the body. But I do believe that cosmetics should be used modestly, to create a nice fragrance, but not to advertise oneself.

I try to use only soaps that are bereft of alcohol-my personal preference is to use only natural (no artificial chemicals) soaps (I like and use African black soaps). I am concerned that many artificial chemicals used as cosmetics lead to damage-especially accelerated drying-to the skin.

But again, the Quran's forbidden use of alcohol clearly references only consumption.

 

Aidan

aslamu alaikum! I have a confusion about this perfume matter. Here in Pakistan in extreme hot weather and humidity, using perfume is an absolute necessity, I try not to wear the strong perfumes but deodorants and mild perfumes are necessary in order to mask the severe smell of sweating, is this haraam?

 

 

 return to the top ^

Express and Explain:

 

General Discussion Forum:

how to act/react to salman rushdie's matter....

 

 

Hkhan (Moderator)

The matter of salman rushdie's knighthood is indeed another test for us and out faith, for our love for the beloved prophet Muhammad sws whom we are supposed to love more than our blood relations; yet it is a test of our patience at the same time. we ought to hold tight to wisdom; we have to act no doubt but in the most appropriate way utilize this opportunity to clarify the situation.

Myself as the VP of pak welfare association in a local community in UK, today we have passed a resolution in the association meeting against this decision and we have organized a meeting with the local MP in this regard for further details and to convey our concerns to the parliament.

Everyone can act with the skills and opportunities he/she has.

We also look upto our genius religious scholars to write about this matter for the general public as well as the state authorities.

am also copying below a message from Muslim council of Britain.

The Muslim Council of Britain is disturbed at the deliberate political decision to confer a knighthood to Salman Rushdie, who vilified our beloved Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) and caused deep hurt to Muslims everywhere.

Today the Muslim Council has written to its affiliate mosques and organisations urging that they face this current provocation with dignity and wisdom and channel their hurt towards positive and peaceful actions. They must resist efforts by fringe elements in the community to exploit disappointment felt at the award.

The MCB has asked its affiliates and the community to convey their feelings on the matter through letters to their parliamentary representatives and through local and national media; at all times observing propriety and restraint.

“This ill advised decision approved by the Prime Minister should not divert you from your course of peaceful protest in the face of this deliberate provocation. Indeed, it should be used as an opportunity to correct the maligning of the character of the Prophet (pbuh) in the book which earned its author his notoriety”, said Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari, MCB Secretary-General.

 

Mujahid

Yes, sister Henna it is a big test again. I sincerely hope we respond to this the way our beloved prophet pbuh and his family responded in such circumstances.

Being an associate of MCB we have written a letter to our local MP. I urge every member of the forum to register his/her disapproval on knighting Salman Rushdie in the most dignified manner at their local MPs.

I attach our letter to Mr James Purnell MP Stalybridge, Cheshire;

Respected Member of Parliament

On behalf of my organisation, Understanding Islam United Kingdom (UI UK), I would like to register our protest at the decision of our government to award knighthood to Mr Salman Rushdie.

Our organisation strongly encourages mutual respect for diverse faiths and schools of thoughts. We are actively engaged in building bridges between different religions, people of different faiths and communities. For this purpose we are engaged in the inter faith forum in Manchester.

Muslims have the ultimate love and respect for our Prophet Of God (peace be upon him). Mr Salman Rushdie is responsible for not only ridiculing our beloved prophet (peace be upon him) but he has also contributed in damaging race and faith relations in United Kingdom, these were never in question prior to the writing of his now infamous book 'The Satanic Verses."

We have the utmost respect for the law and order of our country. We do not support any activity that entails violence. We also believe in the justice of our country. Knighthood is awarded for achievement and excellence in a particular field. It is awarded for heroic efforts by an individual which makes the entire nation proud of such an individual. Most humbly, which criteria does Mr Salman Rushdie fulfil?

We solely believe in peaceful voicing of our views. However, most humbly, I would like to highlight the heartbreak and sadness this decision has brought to the Muslims not only living in UK but all over the world. We feel on this occasion our government has not decided fairly.

kind regards

Mujahid Zaheer (Co ordinator)

Understanding Islam UK

 

salmant

Dear Mujahid/Dr. Henna,

Thank you for voicing the views on this sad incident. I call it sad because, unfortunately it seems muslims have lost their spine against the politically and economically powerful West. We keep quiet when our values and beliefs are insulted, because most of us have weak institutions, greedy leaders, extravagant lifestyles. It was very sad to see UK govt 'surprised' at the agitation from Pakistan, when other Muslim countries remained quiet.

Our continued willingness to wipe the boots or our perceived masters, even if that requires the use of our tongue, is probably a unique feature in the history of nations.

Salman

 

salmant

A very nice article from today's Newspaper on this issue:  http://www.jang.com.pk/jang/jun2007-daily/25-06-2007/col4.htm

 

salman

 

Hkhan (Moderator)

thx for the link S;
i understand Khursheed Nadeem is associated with Al-Mawrid institute of Islamic sciences in some capacity; good to see some contribution.

We sincerely wish that our dear brs and sisters in Pakistan and elsewhere do not burn flags and figures--because this will be exactly in line with what some anti Islamic agencies want them to do; they should rather show constructive attitude as suggested above.

 

 

 

Pause and Ponder:

 

 

The status of a Justification of Jihad against Innocent Civilians
 


Question:

The philosophy of the 'extremist' Muslims seems to be to oppress others regardless of whether they oppressed you or not, just because they belong to the nation of the oppressor. Something seems to be wrong with the theory that all Americans pay taxes so they are funding the violence in Palestine and Afghanistan, so the American civilian is responsible. But I cannot pinpoint what is wrong with this theory. Maybe you can shed some light with some hadith or Qur'anic verse. Abu Bakr (rta) as khalifa did order his men not to kill civilians when they go to war. Civilians are after all tax payers, and indirectly responsible for what their government is doing. So why is it wrong to wage war against them?

 

Answer:

Most Islamic jurists generally agree that the underlying cause for slaying an enemy is their direct engagement in combat against Muslims. Certain contemporary individuals have suggested that tax-paying citizens are 'indirectly' waging war against Muslims. However, there is no provision within the history of Islamic jurisprudence or Shari'ah for 'indirect' engagement in combat. For instance, most jurists are in agreement that old people and disabled individuals cannot be slain. However, these individuals still contributed taxes to their governing authority even centuries ago. In fact, because modern times have led to the clear distinction between commoner and soldier, something not present in the past, it is far easier to distinguish which individuals are directly engaged in combat.

Furthermore, if we examine this issue under the guise of common sense, we find that individuals advocating the position under discussion are in fact undermining their own argument. These individuals often claim that Muslims can attack their enemies' innocent civilians because our innocent civilians are being attacked. They rationalize this by suggesting that because innocent civilians pay taxes they are legitimate targets. However, if one agrees with this argument, then how can we complain that Muslim innocent civilians are being killed? After all, don't our innocent civilians also pay taxes like those of our 'enemies'? Are we to presume that any individual that paid Zakah to the Islamic state in Madinah was considered a legitimate target for Islam's enemies?

Finally, it should be understood that taxes are usually a requirement of living under any governing structure. Every person under that structure's authority must pay taxes. Since there are few places left in the world without governing structures, if all tax-payers are legitimate targets, are we left to believe that there are no innocent civilians left in the world? In my opinion, this is an illogical suggestion. Individuals pay taxes for their welfare, which includes many things besides the right to be protected by their state. To engage in the slaying of innocent civilians is to make a mockery of Islam's most fundamental teachings regarding the sanctity of life.

regards


Adnan Zulfiqar
Research Assistant, Studying Islam

 

 

see: http://www.studying-islam.org/querytext.aspx?id=639

 

   return to the top ^

 

Announcements:

 

Successful Participants
 

ID

Course Name

Country

Grade

7629 Arrangement of the Qur'an USA D
7466 Arrangement of the Qur'an Pakistan D
7640 Arrangement of the Qur'an USA C+
7534 Introduction to the Hadith USA A
7627 Islamic Customs and Etiquette Canada E
7031 Islamic Customs and Etiquette USA E+
7507 Islamic Customs and Etiquette USA D+
6673 Islamic Customs and Etiquette USA D+
7433 Islamic Customs and Etiquette India B+
7635 Islamic Customs and Etiquette USA B
7627 Norms of Gender Interaction Canada B+
7635 Norms of Gender Interaction USA C
7623 The Religion of Islam USA A+
7627 The Religion of Islam Canada B+
6818 The Religion of Islam USA B+
6856 The Religion of Islam Canada A+
7517 Theme of the Qur'an USA A
7623 Understanding Islamic Dietary Law USA A+
5844 Understanding the Sunnah USA C+
7605 Sunnat i Nabawi Pakistan B+

 

 return to the top ^ 

Recent Additions:

 

Articles

 

 

QnA

 

 والدین کے بغیر شادی
 مریض کو موت دینا
 مقدر اور محنت
 معجزات کی قسمیں

 return to the top ^

 

 

 

Spot on Site:

 

To Islamic Sites

 

http://muttaqun.com/topsites/index.html

 

 

 

 return to the top ^

a

 

 

 

Please give us your valued feedback on our guestbook:
 http://www.studying-islam.org/guestbook.aspx

 

 

______________________

 

Studying Islam
51-K Model Town Lahore 54700 Pakistan
Ph: 92-42-586 5145, 92-42-583 4306 Fax: 92-42-586 4856
URL: www.studying-islam.org

Email: info@studying-islam.org